Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Mary Wanjeri Maina v Republic

Maina v Republic (Criminal Case E033 of 2024) [2025] KEHC 19540 (KLR) (5 February 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 19540 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MURANG'A CRIMINAL CASE E033 OF 2024 CW GITHUA, J FEBRUARY 5, 2025 BETWEEN MARY WANJERI MAINA ........................................................................... ACCUSED AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................................ STATE RULING 1. It is trite that admission of an accused person to bond/bail pending trial is a constitutional right subject to existence of compelling reasons. The duty to prove existence of compelling reasons was on the State if admission to bond or bail is opposed. 2. In this case, the prosecution has confirmed that no compelling reasons exist to justify denial of the accused’s right to bond/bail pending trial. 3. In the circumstances, the accused’s application is allowed on terms that she will be released upon executing a bond of Kshs.500,000 together with one surety of a similar amount. The surety will be approved by the Hon. Deputy Registrar. 4. Upon release, the accused shall attend this court whenever required without fail. Orders accordingly. HON. C. W. GITHUA JUDGE 5/2/2025 Ms Muriu: We have already served the defence with copy of our committal bundle. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/19540/eng@2025-02-05 1

page 1 of 2

Ms Nyamu: I confirm receipt. COURT: In that case, hearing is fixed on 18th June, 2025. Orders accordingly. HON. C. W. GITHUA JUDGE 5/2/2025 https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/19540/eng@2025-02-05 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.