Arok v Republic (Revision Case E028 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 19487 (KLR) (10 July 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 19487 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT LODWAR REVISION CASE E028 OF 2025 PJO OTIENO, J JULY 10, 2025 BETWEEN BUL AROK ................................................................................................ APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC (ODPP ............................................................................... RESPONDENT RULING 1. The court has anxiously perused the undated Notice of Motion as against the proceedings of the trial court. 2. Having been charged and convicted of the ofience of Robbery with violence, contrary to section 296(2), he was sentenced to serve a prison term of six (6) years. 3. In the request for revision, there is not disclosed any basis for revision under section 362 of the Criminal Procedure Code. 4. For the court to grant the remedy, it behoves the applicant to prove, incorrectness, illegality of impropriety of any findings, sentence or order recorded or passed. Shot of that, there must be demonstrated an irregularity in the proceedings before the trial court. 5. Here the court finds that one of a prerequisites for the grant of an order of revision has been met. That a convict is remorseful is not a basis for revision. 6. The consequence is that the application lacks merit and is thus dismissed. 7. Let the court file be closed. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT LODWAR, THIS 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 PATRICK J O OTIENO JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/19487/eng@2025-07-10 1
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.