In re Jane (Deceased) (Probate & Administration E009 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 19429 (KLR) (4 November 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 19429 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KWALE PROBATE & ADMINISTRATION E009 OF 2025 F ANDAYI, J NOVEMBER 4, 2025 IN THE ESTATE OF BOWEN JANE RULING 1. This matter coming up on 4th November 2025 for directions on the Notice of Motion dated 4th November 2025 before Honourable Justice Andayi W. F. And Upon Considering the said application filed under certificate of urgency in the absence of the Counsel for the Petitioner/Applicant: It is hereby ordered: 1. That the application is certified urgent. 2. That the application is disposed of forthwith in the terms below as it does not require service. 3. That furtheR to this court''''s orders issued on 30th September 2025 requiring the petitioners to comply with the requirements of the law by providing the documents indicated in the said order, I have seen the further affidavit sworn by the petitioners on 25th October 2025. I am satisfied that the petitioners have complied as directed. 4. That upon consideration of the petition for Grant of Letters of Administration Ad litem it is hereby ordered that the petition be and is hereby allowed and the Grant of Letters of Administration Ad Litem do issue as prayed, limited to the conduct of proceedings and to representing the deceased’s estate in Kiambu High Court Civil Case No. E007 of 2021, Jane Bowen v. David Kamau Muchungu and Simeon Kuria Ngure. 5. That the mention date of 29th November is now vacated and this file is closed. Given under my hand and seal of the Honourable court this 4th day of November 2025. SIGNED BY/FOR: HON. JUSTICE ANDAYI W.F. DATE:2025-11-04 https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/19429/eng@2025-11-04 1
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.