Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Ojiambo v Republic

Ojiambo v Republic (Petition E089 of 2024) [2025] KEHC 19178 (KLR) (Judicial Review) (19 December 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 19178 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) JUDICIAL REVIEW PETITION E089 OF 2024 RE ABURILI, J DECEMBER 19, 2025 BETWEEN GODFREY MUCHANJI OJIAMBO ..................................................... PETITIONER AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. The petition is undated and filed by the convict Geofrey Muchanji Ojiambo who is serving 20 years imprisonment for the ofience of murder on 9/12/2020. 2. The petitioner/applicant seeks for resentencing because he claims that he was given mandatory sentence hence the need to revise it in line with the Francis Karioko Muruatetu & another v Republic [2017] eKLR decision of the Supreme Court. 3. The matter was filed here on 17/6/2022 and has been lying in the Case Tracking System until we undertook an audit of cases. 4. No action has been taken since the filing, not even an enquiry. 5. Furthermore, the matter ought to have been instituted before the criminal Division of the High Court where it first originated vide HCCR 55/2015. 6. Accordingly, the petition for resentencing filed on 17/6/2022 is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution and for being misplaced. 7. This file is closed. I so order. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 R.E. ABURILI https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/19178/eng@2025-12-19 1

page 1 of 2

JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/19178/eng@2025-12-19 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.