Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Benjamin Tarus Kipkorir v Kamera Holdings Limited

Kipkorir v Kamera Holdings Limited (Civil Appeal E621 of 2023) [2025] KEHC 19173 (KLR) (Civ) (22 December 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 19173 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) CIVIL CIVIL APPEAL E621 OF 2023 WM MUSYOKA, J DECEMBER 22, 2025 BETWEEN BENJAMIN TARUS KIPKORIR ........................................................... APPELLANT AND KAMERA HOLDINGS LIMITED ..................................................... RESPONDENT (Appeal from orders made in a ruling, by Hon. CK Cheptoo, Principal Magistrate, PM, delivered on 13th June 2023, in Nairobi MCCC No. E1680 of 2020) RULING 1. I am unable to write the judgement in this matter. 2. The original trial court records were not availed. The record of appeal is not complete. It does not have copies of the proceedings that the trial court conducted. 3. The appeal is on the process that led up to the interlocutory judgement, and the ruling and orders of 13th June 2023 that followed thereafter. A record of those proceedings is critical. 4. I shall, accordingly, return the file to the relevant registry. DELIVERED, VIA EMAIL, DATED AND SIGNED IN CHAMBERS, AT BUSIA, ON THIS 22ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2025. WM MUSYOKA JUDGE Mr. Arthur Etyang, Court Assistant, Busia. Mr. Michael Onyango, Court Assistant, Milimani, Nairobi. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/19173/eng@2025-12-22 1

page 1 of 2

Advocates Mr. Wachakana, instructed by Wachakana & Company, Advocates for the appellant. Ms. Nyambura, instructed by Mbigi Njuguna & Company, Advocates for the respondent. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/19173/eng@2025-12-22 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.