Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Catherine Njeri Macharia v Edward Mwangi Macharia & 1 other

In re Estate of the Late Macharia Kagio (Deceased) (Succession Cause E550 of 2023 & E3183 of 2022 (Consolidated)) [2025] KEHC 18411 (KLR) (Family) (16 December 2025) (Directions) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 18411 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) FAMILY SUCCESSION CAUSE E550 OF 2023 & E3183 OF 2022 (CONSOLIDATED) HK CHEMITEI, J DECEMBER 16, 2025 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF THE LATE MACHARIA KAGIO (DECEASED) BETWEEN CATHERINE NJERI MACHARIA ........................................................ APPLICANT AND EDWARD MWANGI MACHARIA .............................................. 1ST RESPONDENT JAMES IRUNGU MACHARIA ................................................... 2ND RESPONDENT DIRECTIONS 1. The late Macharia Kagio passed on 23rd May 2022 leaving behind a written Will dated 1st June 2021. 2. The Respondent who are Executors of the said Will were granted temporary letters of administration by this court. 3. The Applicant who are the sisters to the Respondents filed various applications seeking orders that the same be revoked. 4. There are also some applications by some beneficiaries claiming purchasers’ interest in the estate. 5. Before these court are the following applications, dated 28/3/23, 15/6/23, 5/9/23, 15/2/24, 28/4/24, 1/10/24, 31/10/24, 24/3/25, 15/5/25, 24/5/25, 18/6/25, 28/7/25 and I suspect more could be on the way. 6. I have perused the 12 applications and, in my view, it does not make any sense to write twelve rulings. It is appreciated that there is a Will made by the deceased and I do not see any reasons why the parties should not gravitate around the said Will. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/18411/eng@2025-12-16 1

page 1 of 2

7. The major protagonist herein are the deceased children and I think the best approach is to determine the validity of the Will or otherwise. 8. This court on 26.5.2023 issued status quo orders and I do not see the same having been set aside. The status quo was to operate from the said date. 9. Consequently, I direct that:(a) The pending applications are deemed objections to the Will and the Applicant’s granted thirty days from the date herein to file and serve any further afidavits and or witness statements. (b) The Respondents upon service shall within 30 days thereafter file any responses and or witness statements. (c) The status quo orders dated 26/5/2023 are hereby extended pending the determination of the objection proceedings herein. (d) The objection shall be heard by way of viva voce evidence. (e) No other application shall be filed without the leave of the court. DATED SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIA VIDEO LINK THIS 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025. H K CHEMITEI JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/18411/eng@2025-12-16 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.