Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Wilson Kairuthi Waweru v Global Snippers Services Limited & 1 other

Waweru v Global Snippers Services Limited & another (Civil Appeal E1175 of 2023) [2025] KEHC 18045 (KLR) (4 December 2025) (Judgment) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 18045 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) CIVIL APPEAL E1175 OF 2023 WM MUSYOKA, J DECEMBER 4, 2025 BETWEEN WILSON KAIRUTHI WAWERU .......................................................... APPELLANT AND GLOBAL SNIPPERS SERVICES LIMITED ................................. 1ST RESPONDENT NATHAN KIPLIMO CHELIMO ................................................. 2ND RESPONDENT (Appeal from the judgement and decree, of Hon. CA Okumu, Resident Magistrate/ Adjudicator, of 3rd November 2023, in Milimani SCCC No. E1205 of 202) JUDGMENT 1. The claim, at the trial court, was by the appellant herein, against the respondents, with respect to compensation, arising from personal injuries, sustained in a motor traffic accident. The respondents filed a response to the claim, principally denying it, but, in the alternative, conceding that the accident happened, and compensation was paid. 2. The matter was disposed of, in terms of section 30 of the Small Claims Court Act, Cap 10A, Laws of Kenya, by documents only. Judgement was delivered, on 3rd November 2023, dismissing the claim. 3. The appellant was aggrieved, hence the appeal. The principal ground being that the trial court erred in finding that compensation was paid. 4. The appeal herein attacks the judgement of the trial court on the merits. Yet, it would appear, the judgement of 3rd November 2023 was a nullity, for it was delivered by a court bereft of jurisdiction. Under section 34(1) of the Small Claims Court Act, the jurisdiction of an adjudicator is limited to 60 days. A determination, outside the 60 days, would be invalid. Such a determination would not provide basis for a challenge on appeal, on merits. The appeal, herein, therefore, has no foundation. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/18045/eng@2025-12-04 1

page 1 of 2

5. As the determination was a nullity, the proceedings, leading up to it, have to be invalidated. The Magistrate Court has jurisdiction over the matter, given that it was filed within the applicable limitation period, and it is within its pecuniary jurisdiction. 6. To do justice to the parties, and in exercise of the supervisory jurisdiction vested in the High Court, by Article 165(6)(7) of the Constitution, I hereby direct that the claim, in the Small Claims Court, being Nairobi SCCCOMM No. E1205 of 2023, be transferred, out of the Small Claims Court, to the Magistrate Court, at the Milimani Commercial Courts, for hearing and disposal. To facilitate that, I hereby invalidate the proceedings, conducted by the Small Claims Court, which culminated in the determination of 3rd November 2023. Orders accordingly. DELIVERED, VIA EMAIL, DATED AND SIGNED IN CHAMBERS, AT BUSIA, ON THIS 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025. WM MUSYOKA JUDGE Mr. Arthur Etyang, Court Assistant, Busia. Mr. Michael Onyango, Court Assistant, Milimani, Nairobi. Advocates Ms. Kanyi, instructed by Kulecho Musomba & Company, Advocates for the appellant. Mr. Owuocha, instructed by Owuocha & Associates, Advocates for the respondents. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/18045/eng@2025-12-04 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.