Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Martin Ngugi Kabinga v Mustapher Onderi Meroka

Kabinga v Meroka (Civil Appeal E928 of 2024) [2025] KEHC 17970 (KLR) (Civ) (2 December 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 17970 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) CIVIL CIVIL APPEAL E928 OF 2024 LP KASSAN, J DECEMBER 2, 2025 BETWEEN MARTIN NGUGI KABINGA ................................................................. APPLICANT AND MUSTAPHER ONDERI MEROKA ................................................... RESPONDENT RULING 1. This is an application for review of Court orders requiring the Appellant to deposit the entire decretal amount of Ksh 4,585,050 as a security and instead the figure be varied to Ksh 3,000,000 which as per the Appellant, constitute insurance limit. 2. I have considered all factors in question. The parties chose not to submit. The purpose of security is to preserve the subject matter. The amount proposed by the Appellant constitute a huge percentage of the decretal amount. 3. To this extend, I shall allow the Application dated the 30th day of July 2025. The reviewed decretal amount to be deposited to Court within 7 days from today. 4. The Respondent shall have costs DATED, DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AND SIGNED ON THIS 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2025. HON L P KASSAN JUDGE In the presence of; Ombati for Applicant https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/17970/eng@2025-12-02 1

page 1 of 2

Wangusi for Respondent Carol – Court Assistant Court By consent file is referred to the lower court. HON L P KASSAN JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/17970/eng@2025-12-02 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.