Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

George Otieno Owino v Republic

Owino v Republic (Criminal Revision E113 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 17442 (KLR) (26 November 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 17442 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT SIAYA CRIMINAL REVISION E113 OF 2025 DK KEMEI, J NOVEMBER 26, 2025 BETWEEN GEORGE OTIENO OWINO ................................................................... APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT (Being an application seeking revision of sentence vide Siaya MCCR E036/2025 before Hon. J.P Mkala and delivered on 8/8/2025) RULING 1. I have considered the Applicant’s request for revision of sentence of four (4) years imprisonment imposed for the ofience of malicious damage to property. 2. I have considered the sentence review report dated 21st November 2025 and note that the same is not favourable for a non-custodial sentence. 3. I find no ground to interfere the sentence by way of revision. 4. The request for revision of sentence aforesaid lacks merit. The same is rejected and that the Applicant to continue serving his sentence to completion. 5. File closed. Orders accordingly. DATED AND DELIVERED AT SIAYA THIS 26 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2025. D. KEMEI JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/17442/eng@2025-11-26 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.