Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 17439 of 2025

In re Estate of Isaya Gatheru Mbuto (Deceased) (Succession Cause 2847 of 2014) [2025] KEHC 17439 (KLR) (Family) (28 November 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 17439 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) FAMILY SUCCESSION CAUSE 2847 OF 2014 PM NYAUNDI, J NOVEMBER 28, 2025 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF ISAYA GATHERU MBUTO(DECEASED) RULING 1. The Application dated 18th July 2025 is presented by the Applicant herein and seeks voiding of sale of parcels of land belonging to the deceased after his death and before confirmation of Grant. The Application is unopposed. The respondent failed to file response notwithstanding the directions issued on 17th September 2025. 2. Accordingly, when the application came up on 11th November 2025, I allowed the application and pursuant to rule 32 of the High Court (Organization and Administration) (General) Rules reserved the reasons for 21st November 2025. 3. It is submitted that the following assets were disposed of irregularly as the grant was yet to be confirmeda. Oloitokitok/ Emperon 456 (including new title 3304-3312) Subdivisions b. Oloitokitok/ Ngama 989,512 and resultant 2683 c. Oloitokitko/ Ngama 966 d. Oloitokitok/ Ngama 1498 (including new titles 2615,2617 and subdivisions) e. Oloitokitok/ Olkaria 404 f. Kajiado/ Olchoro- Onyore 5222 g. Kajiado/ Olchoro- Onyore 5220 h. Dagoretti/ Mutu-ini 120 i. Dagoretti/ Mutu-ini 316 j. Dagoretti/ Mutu-ini T198 https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/17439/eng@2025-11-28 1

page 1 of 3

4. k. Dagoretti/ Mutu-ini T78 l. Two acres known as Oloitokitok/ Dagoretti/ “Mama Waithera”- purchased by the deceased from a women as Mama Waithera m. Two acres known as Oloitokitok/ Ngama “Makutano- received by the deceased in a land exchange from a man known as Makutano n. Approximately 10-17 acres of Land in Narok- location known to the family but currently untitled o. Two acres identified as LR No. Oloitoktok/ Councilor- Location known to the family but without registered title. Section 82 (b) (ii) of the law of succession Act expressly prohibits the sale of immovable property prior to the confirmation of grant. In the case of re Estate of Paul M’Maria (Deceased) [2017] eKLR, the Court held that; 10. 5. The restriction provided by law that no immovable property shall be sold or distributed before confirmation of grant is not merely directory or an embellishment. It is a statutory command with fatal consequences on any transaction done in contravention of the said law. Accordingly, acquisition of immovable property of the estate in contravention of the Law of Succession Act is tinctured with killer poison; and is unlawful acquisition; thus, property so acquired does not enjoy the protection of property rights under article 40(6) of the Constitution. See the clawback provision of the Constitution that: -40(6)The rights under this Article do not extend to any property that has been found to have been unlawfully acquired. Further in Santuzzabilioti alias Mei Santuzza (deceased) v Giancarlo Felasconi (2014) eKLR, the court held:This cannot be the case as the succession court has powers to order a title deed to revert to the names of a deceased person. This in effect amounts to cancelation of the title deed. Further, a succession court can order a cancelation of title deed if a deceased’s property is being fraudulently taken away by non beneficiaries such as where the property is being sold before a grant is confirmed. 6. The properties enumerated under paragraph 3 (l-o) are yet to vest in the deceased and therefore at this stage do not comprise part of the estate. The order for cancellation of title and reverting of title to estate of the deceased will therefore only apply to the properties enumerated under para 3 (a-j). 7. The land registrar to comply with the said order within 45 days. Mention on 17th February 2026 to confirm compliance. 8. Since the parties are family members there shall be no order as to costs. It is so ordered DATED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT NAIROBI THIS 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025. P. M. NYAUNDI JUDGE In the presence of;Fardosa Court Asisstant https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/17439/eng@2025-11-28 2

page 2 of 3

Chebet holding brief for Kinyanjui for Applicant https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/17439/eng@2025-11-28 3

page 3 of 3

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.