Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Nairobi City County v Titus Otieno Koceyo T/A Koceyo & Company Advocates

Nairobi City County v Koceyo t/a Koceyo & Company Advocates (Civil Appeal 225 of 2015) [2025] KEHC 17382 (KLR) (Appeals) (27 November 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 17382 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) APPEALS CIVIL APPEAL 225 OF 2015 LP KASSAN, J NOVEMBER 27, 2025 BETWEEN NAIROBI CITY COUNTY ..................................................................... APPELLANT AND TITUS OTIENO KOCEYO T/A KOCEYO & COMPANY ADVOCATES ........................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. This is an Application to arrest a Ruling on the basis that service was done a day before the setting of a Ruling date. It is a basic Rule that service ought to be done three clear days before a mention or a hearing of any matter in Court unless the matter is extremely urgent. I do not see any urgency in this matter and so I shall allow the application dated the 18th day of June 2025. 2. Each Party shall bear own costs. Mention on 10/2/2026. DATED, DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AND SIGNED ON THIS 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2025. ......................................... HON L P KASSAN JUDGE In the presence of; No appearance for Appellant. Ojienda for Respondent. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/17382/eng@2025-11-27 1

page 1 of 2

Carol – Court Assistant. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/17382/eng@2025-11-27 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.