Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 17178 of 2025

Kiprono v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E018 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 17178 (KLR) (25 November 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 17178 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMET MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION E018 OF 2025 JK NG'ARNG'AR, J NOVEMBER 25, 2025 BETWEEN GEOFFREY CHERUIYOT KIPRONO .................................................. APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. The Applicant was charged with the ofience of murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code. The particulars of the ofience were that on 1st August 2016 at Kipsinende Village, Bosto Sub-Location in Konoin Sub-County within Bomet County, he murdered Richard Metet. 2. This court (Muya J.) found the Applicant guilty of the ofience of murder and sentenced him to death on 19th July 2017. Upon an earlier Application for resentencing dated 9th November 2022, this court (Korir J.) substituted the death sentence with 25 years imprisonment. 3. The Applicant has again applied for resentencing and has asked this court for a lenient sentence on the following grounds: i. That after a thorough soul searching and reflection, he has taken full responsibility for the commission of the ofience and has already served 9 years imprisonment. ii. That he was remorseful and repentant. iii. That the time he has spent in custody has enabled him transform his life iv. That he was provoked into the commission of the ofience by anger and lack of self-control and that he had since matured. v. That he would not pose a danger to the community if he were to be released. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/17178/eng@2025-11-25 1

page 1 of 2

vi. 4. That he needed to be released to get medical attention as he sufiered from chronic epilepsy and ulcers. I have noted that the Applicant has attached a recommendation letter from the Officer in Charge, Kericho Main Prison where it contained copies of the Applicant’s Certificate in prison fellowship, Certificate in Prisoner’s journey, Certificate in Bible League and a Baptismal Certificate. I have also seen a note from the Prison Dispensary indicating that the Applicant sufiers from epilepsy. Analysis 5. As stated earlier in this Ruling, the Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to death. This sentence was later substituted to 25 years imprisonment by this court. It is my view that once this court sentenced the Applicant it became functus officio and thus the Applicant’s recourse lay with the Court of Appeal. InElishipha Muthoni v Republic [2022] KEHC 1410 (KLR) Chepkwony J. held: “ The law abhors that practice of a Judge sitting to review a Judgment or decision of another Judge of concurrent jurisdiction. This is because the rule of the thumb is that courts cannot sit in review/appeal over decisions of their peers of equal and competent jurisdiction much less those courts of higher Jurisdiction than theirs. The court which ought to deal with an issue arising out of the decision of this court is the Court of Appeal as it is the one with jurisdiction under Article 164(3) of the Constitution and Section 379(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. This is in appreciating the provisions of Article 50(2) (q) of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010 which guarantees the right of a person if convicted, to appeal to, or apply for review by, a higher court as prescribed by the law.” 6. Further, inLawrence Kariuki Njeru v Republic [2021] KEHC 6118 (KLR), Njuguna J. held: “ …………. Further this court is bereft of jurisdiction to review the said judgment as doing so would be tantamount to sitting as an Appellate court on the judgment of the Learned Judge and which act the law abhors. The petitioner ought to ventilate the issue on the resentencing and/or excessive sentence at the Court of Appeal………” 7. In the end, I find that this court has no jurisdiction to review the Applicant’s sentence and therefore the Application herein lacks merit and the same is dismissed. RULING DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT BOMET THIS 25THDAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025. ............................. HON. JULIUS K. NG’ARNG’AR JUDGE Ruling delivered in the presence of: Siele/Susan (Court Assistants) Applicant Present Koech for the Respondent https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/17178/eng@2025-11-25 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.