Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Stanbic Bank Kenya Limited v Alex Otuke Ondimu

Stanbic Bank Kenya Limited v Ondimu (Civil Appeal E152 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 17104 (KLR) (18 November 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 17104 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAKURU CIVIL APPEAL E152 OF 2025 SM MOHOCHI, J NOVEMBER 18, 2025 BETWEEN STANBIC BANK KENYA LIMITED ..................................................... APPELLANT AND ALEX OTUKE ONDIMU .................................................................... RESPONDENT RULING Ex-tempore 1. I do consider the application seeking to stay a money decree. 2. I contend that the Respondent is entitled to the fruits of his judgment and as such a conditional order of stay shall be ideal under the circumstances: 1. I thus allow a conditional stay of Judgment Decree in CMCC NO.E436/2024 pending hearing of the Appeal. 2. The Applicant shall pay to the Respondent Kshs.500,000 within the next 45 days. 3. The Applicant shall set down the Appeal for admission and hearing within next 60 days. 4. Default on any of the conditions in (2) and (3) above shall automatically vacate the stay order leaving the Respondent with opportunity to execute. It is so directed. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAKURU ON THIS DAY OF 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025. ___________________________ S. MOHOCHI https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/17104/eng@2025-11-18 1

page 1 of 2

JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/17104/eng@2025-11-18 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.