Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Kelvin Mwangi Kaburu

Republic v Kaburu (Criminal Case E019 of 2023) [2025] KEHC 17033 (KLR) (20 November 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 17033 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NYERI CRIMINAL CASE E019 OF 2023 DKN MAGARE, J NOVEMBER 20, 2025 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ PROSECUTOR AND KELVIN MWANGI KABURU .................................................................... ACCUSED RULING 1. The Accused was charged with murder contrary to section 203 as read with 204 of the Penal Code. 2. The particulars of the ofience were that Kelvin Mwangi Kaburu on 8.12.2014 at Giakaibei Shopping Centre within Mathira East Subcounty in Nyeri County murdered James Weru Kamwenji. 3. The Accused person took plea and denied the charge. The plea of not guilty was recorded. 4. The hearing commenced and the Prosecution called a total of 6 witnesses. Their evidence was recorded and exhibits produced. 5. I have perused the Court file, and exhibits, where the 6 witnesses testified. I have also perused the submissions filed by the Accused person dated 30.10.2025 in opposition to a finding on the prima facie case. As articulated by Sir Newham Worley P. in the case of Ramanlal T. Bhatt Vs. R.(1957) EA 332 “ ... the court is not required at this stage to decide finally whether the evidence is worthy of credit, or whether if believed it is weighty enough to prove the case conclusively: that final determination can only properly be made when the case for the defence has been heard. It may not be easy to define what is meant by a “prima facie case” but at least it must mean one on which a reasonable tribunal, properly directing its mind to the law and the evidence could convict if no explanation is ofiered by the defence.” https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/17033/eng@2025-11-20 1

page 1 of 2

6. Consequently, I am satisfied that the prosecution has established a prima facie evidence to enable the Court to call the Accused to defend himself. I consider the evidence on record sufficient to call upon the Accused to defend himself. I therefore find that the Accused have a case to answer. I put the Accused person on his defence in accordance with Section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code. DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT AT NYERI ON THIS 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025. KIZITO MAGARE JUDGE In the presence of: Mr. Kimani for the Prosecution. Mr. Mbau for the Accused person. Accused present Court Assistant – Michael https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/17033/eng@2025-11-20 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.