Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Hon Njehu Gatabaki v Family Bank Limited & 2 others

Gatabaki v Family Bank Limited & 2 others (Civil Case 258 of 2016) [2025] KEHC 16760 (KLR) (Civ) (18 November 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 16760 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) CIVIL CIVIL CASE 258 OF 2016 LP KASSAN, J NOVEMBER 18, 2025 BETWEEN HON NJEHU GATABAKI ...................................................................... APPELLANT AND FAMILY BANK LIMITED ............................................................. 1ST RESPONDENT CECIL MILLER T/A MILLER & CO. ADVOCATES ................ 2ND RESPONDENT ASHFORD MURIUKI T/A ASHFORD MURIUKI ADVOCATES .... 3RD RESPONDENT RULING 1. This is an application for witnesses who wrote statements to be called to testify in Court. Their statements form part of the bundle of exhibits of the defence. The Application is opposed because their alleged employer who is also a defendant (1 Defendant) has already testified and closed their case. In its reply, the 1 defendant clarified that the said witnesses have since left their employment thus it would be difficult to call them. I have taken into the account the submissions by all parties and wish to note two things; first, the statement of these witnesses are in the bundle of defence documents and so all along, parties have been having possession of their statements. If this Court was to deny this application what would be the fate of their statements? Secondly since these witnesses are no longer employees of the First defendant who can call these witnesses? This being a Court of Justice, it must ensure that there is a wholesome consideration of all facts before final determination. There will be no prejudice to any party because these witnesses will go through the trial process that afiords every party an opportunity to cross examine. Needless to say, the same witnesses are the ones that led into the commencement of this case. 2. I therefore summon the said witnesses to come to Court for cross examination. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/16760/eng@2025-11-18 1

page 1 of 2

DATED, DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AND SIGNED ON THIS 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2025. HON L. P. KASSAN JUDGE In the presence of; No appearance for Applicant Mrs Akong’a for 1st Defendant Mr Sigoma for 2nd Defendant Carol – Court Assistant Mention on 29/01/2026 for hearing https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/16760/eng@2025-11-18 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.