Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Lucy Sewe v Lucy Kachira Awori

Sewe v Awori (Civil Appeal E1335 of 2024) [2025] KEHC 16716 (KLR) (Civ) (17 November 2025) (Judgment) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 16716 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) CIVIL CIVIL APPEAL E1335 OF 2024 LP KASSAN, J NOVEMBER 17, 2025 BETWEEN LUCY SEWE .............................................................................................. APPELLANT AND LUCY KACHIRA AWORI .................................................................. RESPONDENT JUDGMENT 1. This is a claim for damages as a result of injuries sustained from a road traffic accident in which only the plaintiff testified. The only issue for determination in this appeal is therefore on quantum since the Plaintiff in her testimony blamed the Defendant for negligence. The finding by the trial magistrate on liability is therefore upheld. 2. Determination on quantum basically requires the Courts to look at the Plaintiffs testimony and medical reports produced. Dr Wokabi stated that the Plaintiff suffered extensive blunt tissue injury on her left thigh and extensive friction burns on the left thigh. At the time of examination, the Plaintiff experienced pain on her left leg and could not stand for long or able to work. The Doctor added that the plaintiff had extensive deep healing wound covering large areas in the entire outer aspect of the left thigh from the groin to the knee. The report by Doctor Ruga indicates that the Plaintiff suffered severe harm because of friction burns and bruises on the left thigh. He added that although the injuries had healed, there was disfiguring scars. 3. I have read the relevant authorities and taken into account all relevant factors. First the Plaintiff sustained severe injuries and secondly she has been left with large permanent scars on the left thigh stretching from the groin to the knee. The presence of these scars in her "private areas" will significantly affect her confidence, pride of being a woman, her beauty and most likely her present or future spouse. This however depends on her personality but generally scars in such areas have an impact in people’s lives in one way or another. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/16716/eng@2025-11-17 1

page 1 of 2

4. Taking above into account the Lower Court finding is reasonable and covers the Plaintiff's loss of “beauty " that she will have for the rest of her life. The Lower Court decision is upheld. The Respondent shall have costs. DATED, DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AND SIGNED ON THIS 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2025. HON L P KASSAN JUDGE In the presence of; Nyambura for Appellant Kaburu for Respondent Carol – Court Assistants Stay for 30 days granted. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/16716/eng@2025-11-17 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.