Sadik & another v Mwanthi t/a Voterm Studios (Civil Case E1150 of 2022) [2025] KEHC 16608 (KLR) (Civ) (13 November 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 16608 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) CIVIL CIVIL CASE E1150 OF 2022 JN MULWA, J NOVEMBER 13, 2025 BETWEEN AABDULLAHI ABDI SADIK ........................................................... 1ST APPLICANT KHALIFA SHARIFF HASSAN ......................................................... 2ND APPLICANT AND VINCENT MASAKU MWANTHI T/A VOTERM STUDIOS ........ RESPONDENT RULING 1. The Applicants by their motion dated 28 07 2025 seek as against the Respondent an order for adoption of the decision of the Data Protection Commission in OPDC Complaint No. 040 2025 between the complaints and the Respondent rendered on the 9th April 2025 as a judgment of the court for purposes of execution proceedings. 2. I have read the OPDC determination. The Applicants (complainants) were awarded compensation in the sum of Kshs. 650,000 = with a right of appeal of 30 days. Despite being served with the motion on 11 08 2025 by way of Email of which the court is satisfied by the affidavit of service duly filed, and there being no objection to the orders sought by way of response to the motion. Prayer 2 and 3 of the motion are hereby granted with no orders on costs. 3. Orders accordingly. DELIVERED DATED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI THIS 13 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025. ……………………… . JANET MULWA. JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/16608/eng@2025-11-13 1
Original judgment
Aabdullahi Abdi Sadik & 1 other v Vincent Masaku Mwanthi T/A Voterm Studios
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.