Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Ruphence Ngombiano

Republic v Ngombiano (Criminal Case E008 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 16386 (KLR) (12 November 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 16386 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT VOI CRIMINAL CASE E008 OF 2025 AN ONGERI, J NOVEMBER 12, 2025 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ PROSECUTOR AND RUPHENCE NGOMBIANO ....................................................................... ACCUSED RULING 1. The learned counsel for the accused person applied for release of the accused person on reasonable bail/bond terms pending the trial of this case. 2. The learned prosecution counsel did not oppose the application but asked the court to balance the interests of the parties. 3. I have considered the Pre-bail Report filed by the Probation Officer which states that the accused person comes from a low socio-economic background and prayed for a cash bail of Kshs. 25,000/= or a bond of Kshs. 100,000/= 4. Every accused person is entitled to be released on bond unless there are compelling reasons not to grant bond. 5. Every accused person is presumed innocent until proved guilty. 6. However, the charge the accused person is facing is a serious one and the court has to balance the interests of the parties. 7. The accused person may be released on a bond of Kshs. 200,000/= with one surety similar amount. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED THIS 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 IN OPEN COURT AT VOI HIGH COURT. ASENATH ONGERI https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/16386/eng@2025-11-12 1

page 1 of 2

JUDGE In the presence of:Court Assistant: Mabishi/Millicent. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/16386/eng@2025-11-12 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.