Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Rajul Gulabchand Lalji v Konene Ole Narankaik

Lalji v Narankaik (Civil Suit E024 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 16092 (KLR) (29 October 2025) (Judgment) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 16092 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAKURU CIVIL SUIT E024 OF 2025 JM NANG'EA, J OCTOBER 29, 2025 BETWEEN RAJUL GULABCHAND LALJI ................................................................ PLAINTIFF AND KONENE OLE NARANKAIK .............................................................. DEFENDANT JUDGMENT 1. For determination is a Notice of Motion dated 26th June 2025 by which the Plaintiff prays for orders as hereunder;1. Spent. 2. That the Agreement of 28th April, 2022 amounts to an admission of fact of indebtedness, by the Defendant to the Plaintiff as envisaged under Order 13(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules 2010. 3. That judgement be and is hereby entered against the Defendant on admission for the claimed, and admitted sum of Kshs. Eighty Three Million, One Hundred Thousand (Kshs. 83,100,000/=). 4. That interest of 46% of Kshs. Eighty Three Million, One Hundred Thousand (Kshs. 83,100,000/= as per clause 4 of the Agreement dated 28th April 2022, from the date of default (28th April 2022) until the date before judgement. 5. That interest of 12% of Kshs. Eighty Three Million, One Hundred Thousand (Kshs. 83,100,000/=) from the date of judgement until payment in full. 6. That Costs of this Application and the suit, at 14% interest be awarded to the Plaintiff. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/16092/eng@2025-10-29 1

page 1 of 2

2. The Motion is supported by the Plaintiff’s affidavit sworn on the same date of the Application. It is contended that the Defendant admitted indebtedness vide the said Agreement of the parties dated 28th April 2022, without the need to offer proof of the fact. 3. The Plaintiff has filed return of service of the suit documents as well as the Application under consideration. The Defendant has neither entered appearance not filed defence. The Application is also unopposed. 4. Consequently, Judgement on admission is entered as per prayers 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the Application. JUDGEMENT DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT NAKURU THIS 29TH DAY OCTOBER, 2025. J. M. NANG’EA, JUDGE. In the presence of:Mr. Kibet for the Plaintiff Defendant, Absent Court Assistant (Jeniffer) https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/16092/eng@2025-10-29 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.