Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Hexing Technology Company Limited v Public Procurement Administrative Review Board & 2 others

Hexing Technology Company Limited v Public Procurement Administrative Review Board & 2 others; Chint Meters & Electric Kenya Company Limited & 6 others (Interested Parties) (Judicial Review Application E347 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 15794 (KLR) (Judicial Review) (6 November 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 15794 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) JUDICIAL REVIEW JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION E347 OF 2025 RE ABURILI, J NOVEMBER 6, 2025 BETWEEN HEXING TECHNOLOGY COMPANY LIMITED ............................... APPLICANT AND PUBLIC PROCUREMENT ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD .... 1ST RESPONDENT THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER MANAGING DIRECTOR, KENYA POWER & LIGHTING COMPANY PLC .................................................. 2ND RESPONDENT KENYA POWER & LIGHTING COMPANY PLC .................... 3RD RESPONDENT AND CHINT METERS & ELECTRIC KENYA COMPANY LIMITED .... INTERESTED PARTY EAST AFRICA METER COMPANY LTD ............................ INTERESTED PARTY INHEMETER AFRICA COMPANY LIMITED .................... INTERESTED PARTY SMART METER TECHNOLOGY LIMITED ....................... INTERESTED PARTY ABCOS INDUSTRIAL LIMITED .......................................... INTERESTED PARTY MAGNATE VENTURES LIMITED ....................................... INTERESTED PARTY HOUSE OF PROCUREMENT LIMITED ............................. INTERESTED PARTY https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/15794/eng@2025-11-06 1

page 1 of 2

RULING 1. The Originating Motion dated 4/11/2025 seeks Judicial Review orders of prohibition, Declaration, certiorari and mandamus challenging the 1st Respondent’s decision made on 23/10/2025 in Public Procurement Request for Review Application No.85/2025 in respect of Tender No.KPI/9A.3/ RT/14/24-25 for supply of single-phase smart meters (Local Manufactures and Assemblers). The application is brought under certificate of urgency dated 4/11/2025. 2. I have read the application and the accompanying documents and supporting affidavit sworn by Liang Gao on 4/11/2025. The applicant also seeks for an interim relief of prohibition prohibiting the 1st & 2nd Respondents from implementing the impugned decision of the 1st Respondent rendered on 23/10/2025. I find the application to be urgent. I certify it as urgent. The applicant is however warned that it did not have to approach the court at the eleventh hour. 3. On the prayer for interim relief as sought in prayer 2 of the Originating Motion, I am satisfied that unless a stay is granted at this stage, the impugned decision will take effect today thereby rendering these proceedings an academic exercise. 4. I therefore exercise discretion and grant prayer No.2 of the Originating Motion dated 4/11/2025 as sought. I further direct the applicant to file and serve the Originating Motion upon the Respondents and Interested Parties forthwith by close of business today. 5. Upon such service, the Respondents and Interested Parties have 5 days to file and serve their responses. The applicant will then have 5 days of the date of service to file and serve a further affidavit if need arises, together with brief written submissions. 6. Thereafter, the Respondents and Interested Parties shall have 5 days of date of service to file and serve their supplementary affidavit if need arises, together with their brief written submissions. 7. As these proceedings are strictly time bound, the matter shall be mentioned on 26/11/2025 to fix a judgment date. The timelines given are cast in stone in view of the strict timelines for disposal of these proceedings. 8. I so order. DATED, SIGNED & DELIVERED IN CHAMBERS AT NAIROBI THIS 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 R.E. ABURILI JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/15794/eng@2025-11-06 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.