Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Ouma Maurice Otieno T/A Om Otieno & Co Advocates v Africa Merchant Assurance Company Limited

Otieno t/a OM Otieno & Co Advocates v Africa Merchant Assurance Company Limited; Safaricom Plc (Garnishee) (Miscellaneous Application E006 of 2022) [2025] KEHC 15650 (KLR) (29 October 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 15650 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMET MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION E006 OF 2022 JK NG'ARNG'AR, J OCTOBER 29, 2025 BETWEEN OUMA MAURICE OTIENO T/A OM OTIENO & CO ADVOCATES ............................................................................................. APPLICANT AND AFRICA MERCHANT ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ....... RESPONDENT AND SAFARICOM PLC .................................................................................... GARNISHEE RULING 1. 2. The Applicant filed a Chamber Summons Application dated 9th September 2025 which sought the following orders: I. Spent. II. That at the inter parties and/or further hearing of this Application, the Garnishee nisi be made absolute and the monies attached be released to the Decree Holder/Advocate/Applicant, O.M Otieno & Company Advocates to satisfy the decretal sum outstanding at the time of determination of these proceedings. III. That costs of this Application be provided for. The Application was brought under the provisions of Order 23 Rule 1(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules and sections 1A, 1B and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act and it was based on the grounds on the face of the Application and further by the Supporting Affidavit sworn by Ouma Maurice Otieno Advocate on 9th September 2025. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/15650/eng@2025-10-29 1

page 1 of 2

3. In the lead file being Misc. Civil Application Number E004 of 2022, Ouma Maurice Otieno t/a O.M Otieno & Co. Advocates vs Africa Merchant Assurance Co. Ltd & another, this court directed that the order arising from the referenced file shall apply to this file. 4. In its Replying Affidavit dated 15th October 2025 sworn by Cerere Kihoro, the Garnishee’s legal counsel, the Garnishee stated that Till Number 4106404 was held and operated by the Respondent. The Garnishee further stated that 149,334/= in a special utility account and that its compliance was pegged on the availability of funds in the Respondent’s M-pesa account. 5. It was the Garnishee’s response that it was ready and willing to release the funds to the Applicant net of its legal costs of Kshs 35,000/=. 6. Flowing from the above, I make the following orders: I. An order for Garnishee Absolute is issued against Safaricom PLC that all monies belonging to the Judgement Debtor (Africa Merchant Assurance Company Limited) and held by the Garnishee in Till Account Number 4106404 be attached to recover Kshs 149,334/= owed to the Applicant by the Respondent. II. Each party shall bear their own costs in this Application. RULING DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT BOMET THIS 29THDAY OF OCTOBER, 2025. ................................ HON. JULIUS K. NG’ARNG’AR JUDGE Ruling delivered in the presence of: Siele/Susan (Court Assistants). Otieno for the Appllicant Mugumya for the Respondent Matale for the Garnishee https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/15650/eng@2025-10-29 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.