Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Hassan Randu Nzioka v Republic

Nzioka v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E089 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 15601 (KLR) (31 October 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 15601 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MALINDI MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION E089 OF 2025 M THANDE, J OCTOBER 31, 2025 BETWEEN HASSAN RANDU NZIOKA ................................................................... APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. In his Application filed in this Court, the Applicant says that he was convicted of the ofience of defilement in Kaloleni Criminal Case No 9 of 2018 and sentenced to 15 years imprisonment. He appealed to this Court in Criminal Appeal No 23 of 2020, against both conviction and sentence, which appeal was dismissed. 2. The Applicant then moved to this Court by way of Criminal Revision No E008 of 2024 seeking that the Court considers the period spent in custody prior to sentencing, and reduce his sentence accordingly pursuant to Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Given that this Court had considered and determined the Applicant’s appeal, the revision was struck out for want of jurisdiction by dint of Article 165(6) of the Constitution. 3. The Applicant has now come back to this Court seeking the same prayers, but this time by way of a miscellaneous application. This is the third time the Applicant is moving this Court over the sentence imposed upon him. The Application is clearly an abuse of the court process. 4. As stated in my decision in the revision, the Court may only exercise that jurisdiction which has been conferred upon it by the Constitution, statute or both. In Samuel Kamau Macharia & another v Kenya Commercial Bank Limited & 2 others [2012] eKLR the Supreme Court stated that a court cannot expand its jurisdiction through judicial craft or innovation. Duly guided, my finding is that no matter how many times the Applicant moves this Court and no matter what shape or form his applications take, they will all be struck out for want of jurisdiction. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/15601/eng@2025-10-31 1

page 1 of 2

5. The Application being an abuse of the court process is hereby struck out. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED IN MALINDI THIS 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2025 _____________________ M. THANDE JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/15601/eng@2025-10-31 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.