Muli v Republic (Criminal Revision E107 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 15167 (KLR) (27 October 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 15167 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KIBERA CRIMINAL REVISION E107 OF 2025 DR KAVEDZA, J OCTOBER 27, 2025 BETWEEN SPTE SYLVESTER MULI ........................................................................ APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. The applicant was charged and after a full trial convicted of two counts of Attempted Murder Contrary to Section 220 of the Penal Code. He was sentenced to serve 20 years' imprisonment. 2. He filed the present undated application seeking sentence review. The period of three years already spent incarceration is sufficient rehabilitation. 3. I have considered the application, the grounds in support and the applicable law. From the record of the trial court, the court considered the applicants mitigation, the time spent in remand custody and the fact that the applicants were first ofienders before sentencing. Having considered the application in its totality. The sentence imposed was also legal in the circumstances of the case. 4. In my view of the foregoing, I find no good cause or reason to revise the sentence imposed by the trial court. The application dismissed for lacking in merit. Orders accordingly. RULING DATED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY THIS 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2025 ______________ D. KAVEDZA JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/15167/eng@2025-10-27 1
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.