Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Magdalena Kwambai v Helena Jepkangor Kipiego & 4 others

In re Estate of Michael Rutto (Deceased) (Succession Cause 117 of 2023) [2025] KEHC 14958 (KLR) (21 October 2025) (Directions) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 14958 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT ELDORET SUCCESSION CAUSE 117 OF 2023 RN NYAKUNDI, J OCTOBER 21, 2025 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF THE LATE MICHAEL RUTTO (DECEASED) BETWEEN MAGDALENA KWAMBAI .................................................................... PETITIONER AND HELENA JEPKANGOR KIPIEGO ..................................................... 1ST OBJECTOR ROSE JEPTANUI RUTO .................................................................... 2ND OBJECTOR MONICA CHEROTICH BOIT .......................................................... 3RD OBJECTOR MARY RUTO ....................................................................................... 4TH OBJECTOR SALOME JEPKOECH RUTO ............................................................. 5TH OBJECTOR DIRECTIONS 1. This Court delivered a judgment on 21st February 2025 and the parties were directed to file their proposed models of distribution. The parties were encouraged to engage in family mediation to arrive at an amicable arrangement that respects both the rights of the deceased’s immediate family and the inheritance claims by his siblings. The said judgement stated as follows inter alia: “ 31. Consequently, this Court directs that the objectors and the petitioner shall, within 30 days of this judgment, present to the Court a proposed distribution model that recognizes both the widow's rights as well as the legitimate interests of the deceased's siblings, particularly his sisters. The parties are encouraged to engage in family mediation to arrive at an amicable arrangement that respects both the rights of the deceased's immediate family and the inheritance claims of his siblings. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/14958/eng@2025-10-21 1

page 1 of 2

32. Should the parties fail to present an agreed-upon distribution model within the stipulated time, this Court shall exercise its discretion to determine an equitable distribution that protects the interests of all parties, with particular attention to ensuring that the deceased's sisters are not denied their rightful share of their father's inheritance merely because of their gender or the fact that the property was registered in their brother's name. 33. The costs of these proceedings shall be borne by the estate. 2. From the reading of the record, there has been non-compliance with the said orders which were given by this Honourable Court. The parties had put forward an invitation to invoke section 59A of the Civil Procedure Act and Article 159(2)(c) of the Constitution. The mediation to come on a mode of distribution based on the ruling of this court that has not been done. 3. In view of the foregoing, the County Commissioner of Uasin Gishu County Mr. Nyale shall convene a mediation meeting between the parties. The advocates of the High Court shall also be involved to attend a mediation on the issue of distribution. There shall be a further mention on 10th November 2025 to confirm compliance with the aforesaid orders. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF THIS COURT AT ELDORET THIS 21ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2025 ……………………………….. R. NYAKUNDI JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/14958/eng@2025-10-21 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.