Republic v Patrick Kamau Nganga & 1 other

5. On 8/06/2020 a post-mortem was conducted and the cause of death was established to be from multiple injuries due to blunt force trauma; The Post Mortem Report produced into court and was marked as ‘PExh.1’. 6. The accused both stated that the facts as narrated were true and correct and the Court proceeded to convict them on their own plea of ‘Guilty’ for the ofience of Manslaughter c/s to Section 202 as read with Section 205 of the Penal Code. 7. The accused were represented by Learned Counsel Mr. Njehu whereas Mr. Gacharia was the Prosecuting Counsel for the State; Both Counsel were invited to make submissions before sentencing; The accused’s Counsel made oral mitigation submissions whilst prosecuting Counsel for the State requested that a Pre-Sentencing Report be prepared. 8. Counsel submitted that the accused were profoundly remorseful and had willingly accepted responsibility for their actions by pleading guilty to the manslaughter charges and by doing so had saved the Court’s time and conserved judicial time and resources; it was a case of mob justice and they apologized for their conduct and for not being able to control themselves on that fateful day and while out on bond had time to reflect on their actions which led to an unfortunate situation whereby a life was lost; they have taken positive steps to change and they had reached out to the deceased’s family seeking forgiveness and made gestures of reconciliation and peace with them; they pleaded for leniency as the circumstances leading to the demise of the deceased were not pre-meditated; the accused have never been in conflict with the community and the reports received towards them were both positive and it was willing to take them back. 9. They had no prior convictions or criminal history and prayed for a lenient sentence preferably noncustodial and urged the Court to give them a chance to enable integrate back into society to enable them take care of their young families who rely on them. The 1st Accused had two (2) children, one who was barely 2 years old and the other was in PP2. 10. Prosecuting Counsel relied on the Pre-Sentencing Report and submitted that it captured the victim’s family’s views and prayed it be utilized to assist in the Court when passing sentencing. Analysis 11. The applicable law on sentencing for the ofience of manslaughter is found under the provisions of Section 205 of the Penal Code which reads as follows; ‘Any person who commits the felony of manslaughter is liable to imprisonment for life’ 12. It is the duty of this Court to impose a sentence that meets the facts and circumstances of the case; The aggravating factors are the accused’s lack of restraint and making assumptions as to the guilt of the deceased; then their actions of joining hands with others and took the law into their own hands so as to pervert justice. Upon committing the aggressive attacks they purported to take the deceased to the police station but later abandoned him for dead on Biashara Street in Githurai 44. The mitigating factors are that the circumstances leading to the unfortunate incident demonstrate that the accused had no premeditated intention; by accepting the Plea Bargain Agreement the accused had not wasted judicial time and spared the deceased’s mother from further trauma; 13. Other factors taken into consideration is the Victim Impact Assessment Report; Having perused the Report it is noted that the accused had taken reconciliatory steps with the victims’ family. it is noted that the mother had come to terms with her son’s demise and haboured no grudge and had forgiven the two accused persons. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/14830/eng@2025-10-16 2

page 2 of 3

14. The accused are both young man the 1st accused is aged 35 years and the 2nd is 36 years of age; the prosecution had no previous records and it was submitted that they be treated as first ofienders; 15. In the light of the above, this Court is satisfied the accused are both deserving of a custodial sentence to act as a deterrent and a lesson to all other members of the public tempted to take the law into their own hands and engage in mob justice. The Court finds the appropriate sentence to be that of Five (5) years for each accused person. 16. The accused are found to be deserving of the benefits of Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and the period spent in remand shall be deducted from the term of imprisonment. Findings & Determinations 17. Having taken all factors into consideration this Court makes the following findings and determinations: i. The accused are convicted on their own plea of guilty for the ofience of Manslaughter; ii. The accused are hereby sentenced to a five (5) year custodial sentence each. iii. The period spent in remand from the date of arrest when they were released on bail. For Martin, he was arrested on 20/07/2020 and was released on bail on 29/12/2020. For Patrick, he was arrested on 20/07/2020 and released on bail on 5/02/2021. This period be deducted from the sentence. Orders Accordingly. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIA TEAMS AT KIAMBU THIS 16th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025. A. MSHILA JUDGE In the presence of; Sanja – Court Assistant Gacharia – Prosecuting Counsel for the State Njehu – for the Accused X2 Accused – present - out on bond https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/14830/eng@2025-10-16 3

page 3 of 3