Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Georgina Chalete Wangumba v Republic

Wangumba v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E033 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 14572 (KLR) (2 October 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 14572 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MAKADARA MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION E033 OF 2025 J WAKIAGA, J OCTOBER 2, 2025 BETWEEN GEORGINA CHALETE WANGUMBA ................................................. APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ PROSECUTOR RULING 1. Whereas the court has no jurisdiction to grant the orders sought by the applicant, in view of the provisions of Article 159 of the Constitution sub-clause (d) which requires that justice shall be administered without undue regard to procedural technicality, having taken into account the fact that the principal offender the Nigerian who introduced the applicant to the trade of drug has been released, I hereby extend the door of mercy to the applicant on the account of the interest of her two children who she left at home. 2. I have also taken into account the report from the prison department on her change in life and the reformation thereof. 3. I therefore allow the application herein and reduce the applicant sentence to the period served. 4. The applicant shall be set free on conditions that she does not commit a similar offence in future and to be assisted through the prison welfare department in setting up a small business/trade while she settles in the rural home. And it is so ordered DATED THIS 2ND DAY OF OCTOBER 2025. HON. JUSTICE WAKIAGA JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/14572/eng@2025-10-02 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.