Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Benjamin Ouma Abele v Republic

Abele v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E043 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 13888 (KLR) (16 September 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 13888 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION E043 OF 2025 JM OMIDO, J SEPTEMBER 16, 2025 BETWEEN BENJAMIN OUMA ABELE .................................................................... APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. From the record of lower court, which is before me, the Applicant remained in remand custody for 126 days awaiting the conclusion of his trial. 2. It is instructive from the same record that the learned trial magistrate did not take into consideration the 126 days as is mandatorily required under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, when sentencing the Applicant, which provision requires that the period an accused person spends in remand be taken into consideration. 3. That then gives the result that the application is merited. 4. I therefore allow the application with the result that 126 days shall be deducted from the 4-year period of imprisonment that he was ordered to serve. 5. This file is closed. DELIVERED (VIRTUALLY), DATED AND SIGNED THIS 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025. JOE M. OMIDO JUDGE Applicant: Present, Virtually. For Respondent: Ms. Muema. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/13888/eng@2025-09-16 1

page 1 of 2

Court Assistant: Mr. Ngoge. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/13888/eng@2025-09-16 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.