Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Samuel Gitau Kamau v The Office of The Director of Public Prosecutions

Kamau v Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Constitutional Petition E006 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 13769 (KLR) (30 September 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 13769 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT GARSEN CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION E006 OF 2025 JN NJAGI, J SEPTEMBER 30, 2025 BETWEEN SAMUEL GITAU KAMAU .................................................................... PETITIONER AND THE OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS ................................................................................. RESPONDENT RULING 1. The Applicant has ffiled an application alleging violation of his constitutional rights in that he was not supplied with witness statements during the trial; was not provided with an interpreter and that the language used during the trial was not indicated in the court record. The Applicant however did not provide a record of the trial court to support his assertions. Consequently, this court is unable to determine the matter without advantage of proceedings of the trial court. 2. In view of that I order that the Deputy Registrar of this court to provide copies of proceedings and judgment of the trial court in Garsen Criminal case No.7 of 2016. 3. Mention on 28/10/25. RULING DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT GARSEN THIS 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2025. J. N. NJAGI JUDGE In the presence of: Ms Mkongo for Respondent Petitioner: Present GK Prison Malindi https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/13769/eng@2025-09-30 1

page 1 of 2

Court Assistant - Rahma https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/13769/eng@2025-09-30 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.