Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Nicholus Kiiru v Republic

Kiiru v Republic (Criminal Revision E099 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 13610 (KLR) (2 October 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 13610 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KIBERA CRIMINAL REVISION E099 OF 2025 DR KAVEDZA, J OCTOBER 2, 2025 BETWEEN NICHOLUS KIIRU .................................................................................. APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. The applicant was charged with the ofience of attempted defilement contrary to section 9(1) as read with section 9(2) of the Sexual Offences Act, No. 3 of 2006. In the alternative, he was charged with the ofience of committing an indecent act with a child contrary to section 11(1) of the same Act. After a full trial, he was convicted and sentenced to serve ten (10) years imprisonment on the main charge. His appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed by this court. 2. He filed the present undated application seeking sentence review. The grounds raised are that trial court failed to consider the time spent in remand custody during computation of sentence. 3. From the record, the applicant filed an appeal against his conviction and sentence which was heard and determined by this court. This court is therefore functus oficio. The right forum for the applicant is the Court of Appeal. 4. In the circumstances, the application is dismissed. Order accordingly. RULING DATED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY THIS 2ND OCTOBER 2025 ........................ D. KAVEDZA JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/13610/eng@2025-10-02 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.