Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Benson Maithia Muli v Republic

Muli v Republic (Criminal Revision E096 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 13609 (KLR) (2 October 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 13609 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KIBERA CRIMINAL REVISION E096 OF 2025 DR KAVEDZA, J OCTOBER 2, 2025 BETWEEN BENSON MAITHIA MULI ..................................................................... APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. The applicant was convicted of the offense of defilement contrary to section 8(1) as read with section 8(3) of the Sexual Offences Act No. 3 of 2006. He was sentenced to twenty years imprisonment. His appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed by this court. 2. He filed the present application dated 6th August 2025 seeking sentence review. The grounds raised are that trial court failed to consider the time spent in remand custody during computation of sentence. 3. From the record, the applicant filed an appeal against his conviction and sentence which was heard and determined by this court. This court is therefore functus oficio. The right forum for the applicant is the Court of Appeal. 4. In the circumstances, the application is dismissed. Order accordingly. RULING DATED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY THIS 2ND OCTOBER 2025 _____________ D. KAVEDZA JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/13609/eng@2025-10-02 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.