James Mwaganu Mwangi & 1 other v Peter Kamunyu Muchendu

iii. That this Honourable Court do issue an order declaring that the Applicants are the rightful and beneficial owners of LR No Muguga/Jet Scheme/3937 being held in the custody of the Interested Party herein; iv. That the costs of the Application be provided for. 3. In the Supporting Affidavit, the Applicants aver the property was the subject of rigorous litigation, which culminated with a decision rendered by Hon. Justice Muigai on 30 April 2015. In her decision, the Learned Judge declared the Applicants herein to be bona fide purchasers of the subject property and gave the go ahead for the Applicants to conclude the sale transaction. 4. The Applicants further aver that on 7 October 2015, Hon. Justice Muigai ordered the Land Registrar, Kiambu County, to revoke the title deed for the subject property in the name of the Peter Kamunyu Muchendu and John Njoroge Muchendu in trust for Samuel Nyutu. Instead, Peter Kamunyu Muchendu and John Njoroge Muchendu charged the title to Rafiki Microfinance Bank Ltd, the Interested Party, for a sum of Kshs 700,000/=. The Applicants aver that they were forced to pay Kshs 130,000/= to the Interested Party, in a bid to have the title released. The loan has since been cleared and the Applicants wish to have the title released to them. 5. The Respondent did not participate in these proceedings, despite being served. 6. The Interested Party filed a Replying Affidavit sworn on 3 June 2025. The gist of the response is that the Interested Party is not opposed to releasing the title deed. They aver that on 14 August 2023, the loan amount was repaid in full and the Interested Party’s stake and interest in the property was extinguished. They contend that upon repayment of a loan, it is incumbent upon the Chargor to collect the original title document and an executed Discharge of Charge from the financial institution for registration of the Discharge of Charge. 7. The Interested Party avers that in the instant case, the Chargors, Peter Kamunyu Muchendu and John Njoroge Muchendu, have not approached the Bank with a view of collecting the title document. They aver that in the absence of express orders from the Court, the Interested party cannot release the title to persons who are not the Chargors. The Interested Party cited the Supreme Court case of Communications Commission of Kenya & 4 Others -vs- Royal Media Services & 7 others . 8. I have read the Application and the response. I have also read the Ruling of this Court rendered on 30 April 2015 by Hon. Justice W. Muigai. In the circumstances, the Application is merited. I allow the Application and further order that the Interested Party be struck out of these proceedings. 9. Each party shall bear their own costs. DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 7 DAY OF AUGUST 2025 HELENE R. NAMISI JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT Delivered on virtual platform in the presence of: Applicants: Mrs. Morara Respondent: N/A Interested Party: Mr. Ndichu Court Assistant: Lucy Mwangi https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/11876/eng@2025-08-07 2

page 2 of 2