Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Grace Wangui Gichuhi & 1 other v Progressive Credit Limited & 1 other

Gichuhi & another v Progressive Credit Limited & another (Civil Suit E032 of 2023) [2025] KEHC 11554 (KLR) (11 July 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 11554 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KIAMBU CIVIL SUIT E032 OF 2023 DO CHEPKWONY, J JULY 11, 2025 BETWEEN GRACE WANGUI GICHUHI ........................................................... 1ST APPLICANT WILSON GICHUHI KIMANI ......................................................... 2ND APPLICANT AND PROGRESSIVE CREDIT LIMITED ............................................ 1ST RESPONDENT RISING SUN AUCTIONEERS .................................................... 2ND RESPONDENT RULING 1. This case came up before court for parties to Notice to Show cause why the suit should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. According to Mr. Munene, the Plaintifis and their counsel have not been in attendance in court since 6th November, 2024 and neither have they complied with Order 11 of the Civil Procedure Rules as directed vide the ruling delivered on 20th June, 2024. In view of this, the Defendants’ Counsel has sought that the court dismisses the suit for want of prosecution. 2. Upon listening to counsel for the Defendant, I have perused the court record and confirm that the last time the Plaintifi’s Counsel was in court was on 23rd January, 2024. Since then, neither the Applicants/ Plaintifis nor their counsel have attended court, not even during delivery of the ruling on 26th June, 2024. This also applies to the date of 6th August, 2024, 29th August, 2024, 11th September, 2024, 6th November, 2024, 4th December, 2024, 10th February, 2025, 14th May, 2025 and 12th June, 2025 when the matter has been cause-listed for mention before court and Notices served accordingly upon the Applicants/Plaintifis’ counsel. It is also noted that the Plaintifis/Applicants are yet to comply with Order 11 of the Civil Procedure Rules. 3. It is therefore clear that the Applicants/Plaintifis are no longer keen on prosecuting the suit. For this reason, the court finds it necessary to unclog the court system of backlog and proceeds to dismiss the https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/11554/eng@2025-07-11 1

page 1 of 2

suit for want of prosecution as provided for under Order 17 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules with costs to the Respondents. It is so ordered. RULING DATED AND SIGNED AT KIAMBU THIS 11TH DAY OF JULY 2025. (UPLOADED VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL) D. O. CHEPKWONY JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/11554/eng@2025-07-11 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.