Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Stephen Maina Mwangi & 1 other v Bedan Mwangi Maina

Mwangi & another v Maina (Civil Appeal E200 of 2021) [2025] KEHC 11434 (KLR) (10 June 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 11434 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KIAMBU CIVIL APPEAL E200 OF 2021 DO CHEPKWONY, J JUNE 10, 2025 BETWEEN STEPHEN MAINA MWANGI .......................................................... 1ST APPELLANT JAMES MWANGI .............................................................................. 2ND APPELLANT AND BEDAN MWANGI MAINA ................................................................ RESPONDENT (Being an Appeal from the Judgment of the Hon. J. A. Ogonda, Principal Magistrate on 5th October, 2021) RULING 1. The matter was scheduled for interparties hearing of a Notice of Motion application dated 5th November, 2024 in which the Applicant seeks for:a. Spent. b. Spent. c. This Honourable Court be pleased to grant an order to release the decretal sum of Kenya Shillings Five Hundred and Fourteen Thousand and Five Shillings (Kshs.514,005) deposited with the court by the Appellant be released to the Advocates for the Respondent to realise payment of the decretal sum upon conclusion of the appeal. d. The interest of Kshs.53,198.88 being the interest on costs was not deposited to the court to be paid to the Respondent’s advocates firm being MKN & Co. Advocates together with costs of the suit of Kshs.110,831.00 forthwith by the Appellants. e. In default Prayer No.4 above execution to issue against the Appellant for recovery f the same. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/11434/eng@2025-06-10 1

page 1 of 2

f. That costs of this application be provided. 2. The application is premised on the grounds set out on its face, certificate and supporting affidavit sworn by Kirui Sharon on even date. There is no appearance for and by the Respondents and neither is there a response to be said application. 3. It is worth noting that the hearing date was causelisted and posted on the Judiciary’s e-portal. 4. In view of this, the application is unchallenged and this court proceeds to allow the same as prayed in the following terms:a. That the decretal sum of Kenya Shillings Five Hundred and Fourteen Thousand and Five Shillings (Kshs.514,005) deposited with the court by the Appellants be and is hereby released to the Advocates for the Respondent to realise payment of the decretal sum upon conclusion of the appeal. b. The interest of Kshs.53,198,88 being interest on costs which was not deposited to the court to be paid to the Respondent’s Advocate firm being MKN & Co. Advocates together with costs of the suit of Kshs.110,831.00. c. The Respondents to bear the costs of the application. It is so ordered. RULING DELIVERED VIRTUALLY, DATED AND SIGNED AT KIAMBU THIS 10TH DAY OF JUNE 2025. D. O. CHEPKWONY JUDGE In the presence of: Mr. Kinyua Wanjohi counsel for Respondent/Applicant Court Assistant - Martin https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/11434/eng@2025-06-10 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.