Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Charles Obote v Republic

Obote v Republic (Criminal Miscellaneous Application E108 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 11134 (KLR) (28 July 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 11134 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION E108 OF 2025 JM OMIDO, J JULY 28, 2025 BETWEEN CHARLES OBOTE ................................................................................... APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. I have considered the Applicant’s Notice of Motion dated 7th July, 2025 seeking for an order for sentence review. 2. From the trial court’s record, the Applicant took plea on 21st March, 2023 and was remanded in custody until 11th March, 2024 when he was sentenced to serve 3½ years imprisonment. 3. It is clear from the record of the trial court that the period that the Applicant remained in custody as his trial proceeded was not considered by the trial court when the sentence was imposed as is mandatorily required under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. 4. That being the case, I find merit in the Applicant’s Notice of Motion. I will proceed to allow the same to the extent that the sentence of imprisonment of 3½ years shall run from 21st March, 2023. 5. This file is closed. DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED THIS 28TH DAY OF JULY, 2025. JOE M. OMIDO JUDGE Applicant: Present, virtually. For the Respondent: Ms. Jebichii, Prosecution Counsel. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/11134/eng@2025-07-28 1

page 1 of 2

Court Assistants: Mr. Ngoge & Mr. Juma. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/11134/eng@2025-07-28 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.