Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Mohamed Ali v The County Assembly of Bungoma & 4 others

Ali v County Assembly of Bungoma & 4 others (Petition E010 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 10800 (KLR) (23 July 2025) (Directions) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 10800 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT BUNGOMA PETITION E010 OF 2025 MS SHARIFF, J JULY 23, 2025 BETWEEN MOHAMED ALI ..................................................................................... PETITIONER AND THE COUNTY ASSEMBLY OF BUNGOMA ............................. 1ST RESPONDENT THE SPEAKER OF THE COUNTY ASSEMBLY ....................... 2ND RESPONDENT THE GOVERNOR OF BUNGOMA COUNTY ......................... 3RD RESPONDENT THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEMBER FINANCE .... 4TH RESPONDENT THE CONTROLLER OF BUDGET ............................................ 5TH RESPONDENT DIRECTIONS 1. Whereas this matter was coming up for hearing of the Notice of motion dated 4.7.2025, parties counsels have agreed that the application be abandoned and parties to proceed to canvass the substantive petition. 2. The respondent to file and serve their responses to the petition within 5 days from the date hereof and the petitioner is granted leave to file a supplementary affidavit within 8 days from the date hereof. 3. The Petitioner to file and serve written submissions within 15 days from the date hereof and the respondents to do so within 22 days from the date hereof. 4. Mention on 19.8.2025 to confirm compliance and take a judgement date. 5. Interim orders are extended to 19.8.2025. M.S. SHARIFF https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/10800/eng@2025-07-23 1

page 1 of 2

JUDGE 23.07.2025 https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/10800/eng@2025-07-23 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.