Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

County Government of Bungoma v Kenya Power and Lighting Co (kplc) & 2 others

County Government of Bungoma v Kenya Power and Lighting Co (KPLC) & 2 others; Council of Governors & another (Interested Parties) (Petition E011 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 10790 (KLR) (15 July 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 10790 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT BUNGOMA PETITION E011 OF 2025 MS SHARIFF, J JULY 15, 2025 BETWEEN COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF BUNGOMA ...................................... PETITIONER AND KENYA POWER AND LIGHTING CO (KPLC) ........................ 1ST RESPONDENT C.S.MINISTRY OF ENERGY & PETROLEUM ......................... 2ND RESPONDENT ATTORNEY GENERAL ............................................................... 3RD RESPONDENT AND COUNCIL OF GOVERNORS ................................................ INTERESTED PARTY INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONSTECHNICAL COMMITTEE ........................................................................... INTERESTED PARTY RULING 1. This matter coming up for directions today before me I have heard the oral submissions of parties advocates and they are all in agreement on the need to have the issue resolved through the intergovernmental relations Technical Committee. 2. I will encourage praties to do so within 1 day. This matter will mentioned on 24.7.2025 for further directions. 3. I am inclined to issue interim orders in terms of prayers No. 2 and 3 of the said application until tomorrow. DELIVERED, SIGNED AND DATED AT BUNGOMA THIS 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2025. MWANAISHA S. SHARIFF https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/10790/eng@2025-07-15 1

page 1 of 2

JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/10790/eng@2025-07-15 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.