Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Alex Luvisha Alias Gukaa & 1 other

Republic v Luvisha & another (Criminal Case E017 of 2023) [2025] KEHC 10482 (KLR) (17 July 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 10482 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT VIHIGA CRIMINAL CASE E017 OF 2023 JN KAMAU, J JULY 17, 2025 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ........................................................................................... PROSECUTION AND ALEX LUVISHA ALIAS GUKAA ......................................................... 1ST ACCUSED DANCAN LULAMBA ........................................................................... 2ND ACCUSED RULING 1. The Prosecution’s case in this matter was heard on diverse dates between 30th January 2025 and 28th February 2025 when the same was closed after calling a total of nine [9] Prosecution witnesses. 2. The Prosecution did not file Written Submissions on the question of whether or not the 1st and 2nd Accused persons had a case to answer. It relied on the evidence that had been adduced by its witnesses. 3. Although the 1st and 2nd Accused persons indicated that they would be filing Written Submissions on the question of whether or not they had a case to answer, by the time the court retired to write the Ruling herein, the same were not in the e-portal. 4. Having carefully considered the evidence by the Prosecution witnesses, this court was of the opinion that a prima facie case had been established against the 1st and 2nd Accused persons herein to warrant them being put on their defence. They are hereby put on their defence. 5. It is so ordered. DATED AND DELIVERED AT VIHIGA THIS 17TH DAY OF JULY 2025 J. KAMAU JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/10482/eng@2025-07-17 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.