Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Pallavi Vinechand Shah v Hasmukh Amratlal Joshi & 1 other

Shah v Joshi & another (Miscellaneous Civil Application E463 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 10372 (KLR) (Civ) (30 June 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 10372 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION E463 OF 2025 SIFUNA NIXON, J JUNE 30, 2025 BETWEEN PALLAVI VINECHAND SHAH ............................................................. APPLICANT AND HASMUKH AMRATLAL JOSHI ................................................. 1ST RESPONDENT HEEMA HASMUKH JOSHI ........................................................ 2ND RESPONDENT RULING 1. This ruling is on the Plaintiff’s Application for leave to serve the Defendants by substituted service. The hearing date of 15th July 2025 is hereby vacated. This being an Application for leave to serve this matter (Original Suit) by way of substituted service, the Application is hereby allowed. 2. This is In terms that the Plaintiff is hereby granted leave to serve the original suit pleadings and Summons (Summons to Enter Appearance) by substituted service by way of an advertisement in a prominent newspaper of national circulation within Kenya. 3. The advertisement be served within 14 days from today, and an Affidavit that service be filed with a copy of the advertisement annexed. There shall be a Mention on 22nd July 2025, to confirm compliance and for further orders. DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI ON THIS 30TH DAY OF JUNE 2025. PROF (DR) NIXON SIFUNA JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/10372/eng@2025-06-30 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.