Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Ibrahim Issack and Company Advocates v Monarch Insurance Company Limited

Ibrahim Issack and Company Advocates v Monarch Insurance Company Limited (Miscellaneous Civil Application 36 of 2020) [2025] KEHC 10289 (KLR) (Civ) (25 June 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 10289 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION 36 OF 2020 SIFUNA NIXON, J JUNE 25, 2025 BETWEEN IBRAHIM ISSACK AND COMPANY ADVOCATES .......................... APPLICANT AND MONARCH INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ......................... RESPONDENT RULING 1. This is an Application by an Advocate the Applicant Ibrahim Issack Advocates against his Client the Monarch Insurance Company Ltd. The Application was brought under Section 51 (2) of the Advocates Act Cap 16 Laws of Kenya. The same is for judgment for Ksh89,405/70 in terms of the Certificate of Costs dated 19th July 2021. The same is by Hon. L. Mbacho Taxing Officer. The Application was duly served on the Respondent. 2. The Certificate being valid, and it having not been set aside, the Application is hereby allowed, and consequently judgment is hereby entered for the Applicant for the said sum of Ksh 89,405/70= being the amount in the said Certificate of Taxation of Hon L. Mbacho. 3. The same is with interest from the date of Taxation. I also award the Applicant costs of this Application; which I hereby assess at Ksh10,000=. 4. I further direct that a decree be issued in terms of this Judgment. DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI ON THIS 25TH DAY OF JUNE 2025. PROF (DR) NIXON SIFUNA JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/10289/eng@2025-06-25 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.