Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Apa Insurance Company Ltd v Farid Faraj Bukheit

APA Insurance Company Ltd v Bukheit (Civil Miscellaneous E135 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 9892 (KLR) (9 July 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 9892 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT BUNGOMA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS E135 OF 2025 MS SHARIFF, J JULY 9, 2025 BETWEEN APA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD ..................................................... APPLICANT AND FARID FARAJ BUKHEIT ................................................................... RESPONDENT RULING 1. I have considered the Notice of Motion dated 26.6.2025, the affidavit in support thereof sworn by Ruth Mbalelo on 19.6.2025 and the enclosures attached thereto and I do note that the said application has not been opposed by the respondent, Farid Faraj Bukheit albeit served upon him on 1st July 2025 via Whatsapp through his mobile number 0722xxxxxx as evident from the affidavit of service sworn by Godfrey Livoywa Madekwa on 1st July 2025. I thus find that the application is well merited and I thus allow it and make the following orders:i. The applicant APA insurance company Ltd is hereby granted leave to file a declaratory/ repudiatory suit against the respondent outside the limitation period specifically within 7 days from the date thereof in respect of an accident which occurred on 12.10.2023 involving the respondent motor vehicle Registration No. [particulars withheld]. ii. The applicant shall meet its own costs of this application. iii. This file is hereby marked as closed. DELIVERED, SIGNED AND DATED AT BUNGOMA THIS 9TH DAY OF JULY 2025. M.S. SHARIFF JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/9892/eng@2025-07-09 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.