Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Polycap Ochieng v Republic

Ochieng v Republic (Criminal Miscellaneous Application E051 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 9319 (KLR) (27 June 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 9319 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION E051 OF 2025 A MABEYA, J JUNE 27, 2025 BETWEEN POLYCAP OCHIENG .............................................................................. APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. On 13/5/2024, Polycap Ochieng was charged with the ofience of housebreaking contrary to section 304(1) (b) of the Penal Code Cap 63 Laws of Kenya. It was alleged that on 8/5/2024 at Menara village, within Muhoroni, he broke into the house of Maureen Wanyama and stole therefrom property valued at Kshs.25,000/-. 2. After trial, he was found guilty, convicted of the ofience and sentenced to a total of seven (7) years’ imprisonment. The applicant was in custody between 13/5/2024 and 13/11/2024, a period of 6 months. 3. By a Motion on Notice dated 1/4/2025, he sought that the provisions of section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code be taken into account in computing the period of his incarceration. The State did not oppose the application. 4. Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code provided that: “ Subject to the provisions of section 38 of the Penal Code (Cap 63) every sentence shall be deemed to commence from, and to include the whole of the day of, the date on which it was pronounced, except where otherwise provided in this Code. Provided that where the person sentenced under subsection (1) has, prior to such sentence, been held in custody, the sentence shall take account of the period spent in custody.” https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/9319/eng@2025-06-27 1

page 1 of 2

5. I have considered the entire record. I have also considered the proceedings of the trial Court, the judgment and sentence. The Court did not order that the period which the applicant spent in custody during the trial be taken into account. 6. In this regard, I find the application to be meritorious. I allow the same. I direct that the tabulation of the sentence of 7 years shall commence on 13/5/2024. It is so ordered. DATED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 27TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025. A. MABEYA, FCI Arb JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/9319/eng@2025-06-27 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.