Je Rang v Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Interior & Coordination & 2 others (Judicial Review Application E164 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 8537 (KLR) (Judicial Review) (19 June 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 8537 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) JUDICIAL REVIEW JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION E164 OF 2025 RE ABURILI, J JUNE 19, 2025 BETWEEN KIM JE RANG .......................................................................................... APPLICANT AND CABINET SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF INTERIOR & COORDINATION ......................................................................... 1ST RESPONDENT DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION SERVICES .... 2ND RESPONDENT DIRECTOR OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS ..................... 3RD RESPONDENT RULING 1. The application dated 17/6/2025 is not certified urgent. The applicants’ Counsel has appeared virtually and is guided that the Originating Motion application cannot stand as the affidavit in support is fatally defective. It is sworn at Nairobi yet the applicant claims that he is in South Korea and was deported and banned from coming to Kenya. 2. As Counsel Mr. Ojienda for the applicant is guided and he agrees that the said affidavit is fatally defective, and on his oral application, therefore, the Originating Motion and all the documents filed in support are hereby marked as wholly withdrawn with no orders as to costs and this file is closed. 3. I so order. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT NAIROBI THIS 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 R.E. ABURILI JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/8537/eng@2025-06-19 1
Original judgment
Kim Je Rang v Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Interior & Coordination & 2 others
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.