Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 8208 of 2025

In re RKM (Minor) (Adoption Cause E06 of 2023) [2025] KEHC 8208 (KLR) (11 June 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 8208 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT ELDORET ADOPTION CAUSE E06 OF 2023 RN NYAKUNDI, J JUNE 11, 2025 RULING 1. 2. 2. This is an application in the above-mentioned case seeking the following orders:i. That this Honourable court be pleased to reinstate the suit herein which was dismissed on 5th February 2024 ii. This Honourable court be pleased to give directions as of an early date of hearing of this suit. iii. That the costs of this application be provided for It is further supported by an affidavit sworn by Euniah Kerubo Kegege which states as follows: i. That I am an adult of sound mind, the applicant herein hence conversant with the facts of this suit ii. That this suit herein was dismissed on 5.2.2024 for want of prosecution iii. That the applicant had not complied with the orders in situ iv. That the noncompliance of the orders was due to prolonged social assessment by the adoption agency which was necessary v. That the applicant has meritorious case as evidenced by the report duly filed in court vi. That it is in the interest of justice that this suit be reinstated vii. That I swear this affidavit in support of my application for reinstatement of this suit. The Applicant has demonstrated sufficient cause to reinstate the suit and the same is fixed for hearing on 17.6.2025 GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND THE SEAL OF THIS COURT THIS 11TH DAY OF JUNE 2025. R. NYAKUNDI https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/8208/eng@2025-06-11 1

page 1 of 2

JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/8208/eng@2025-06-11 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.