Mugendi Karigi & Co Advocates v Nduta (Miscellaneous Application E083 of 2023) [2025] KEHC 7276 (KLR) (23 May 2025) (Judgment) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 7276 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KIAMBU MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION E083 OF 2023 A MSHILA, J MAY 23, 2025 BETWEEN MUGENDI KARIGI & CO ADVOCATES ............................................ APPLICANT AND JAMES MWANGI NDUTA ................................................................. RESPONDENT JUDGMENT 1. Before court is the Notice of Motion dated 30th July, 2024 and brought under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act (CAP 16); Section 1A, 1B, 3A of the Civil Procedure Act; Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules and all Enabling Provisions of law; The Applicant sought for the following orders:a. That this Honourable Court be pleased to enter Judgment in favor of the Applicant/Advocate herein, in accordance with the taxed costs of Kenya Shillings One Hundred and Fifty One Thousand Eight Hundred and Sixty Six (Kshs 151,866/-). b. That the costs be provided for and the Respondent be condemned to pay the costs of this application. 2. The application is premised on the grounds on the face of the application and the Supporting Affidavit of Morris M. Karigi dated 30/07/2024 made in support of the application; therein he states that the Respondent instructed the firm of Mugendi & Co. Advocates to act for him in Kiambu Chief Magistrates Courtin Civil Case No E106 of 2023. 3. The Respondent failed to pay the legal fees thereby necessitating the filing of the Bill of Costs which was taxed and a Certificate of Taxation was issued for Kshs 151,866/- which the Respondent has failed and/or neglected to settle. 4. The instant application was uncontested as the Respondent failed and or neglected to file any response despite service having been efiected. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/7276/eng@2025-05-23 1
page 1 of 3
5. The Applicant prayed that judgment be entered as prayed for the sum of Kshs 151,866/-; The Applicant also prayed for costs of the application. Issues For Determination 6. Having considered the application and the supporting affidavit the issues framed for determination are; (i) Whether the application is merited for the court to adopt the Certificate of Taxation and enter judgment in the sum of Kshs 151,866/- and; Analysis 7. Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act provides:“ the certificate of the taxing officer by whom any bill has been taxed shall unless it is set aside or altered by the court, be final as to the amount of the costs recovered thereby; and the court may make such orders in relation thereto as it thinks fit, including where the retainer is not disputed an order that judgment be entered for the sum of certified to be due with costs.” 8. The wordings of the above section empower the court to enter judgment on the taxed amount if the same is uncontested. 9. In determining whether the court should adopt the amount on the Certificate of Taxation as the judgment of the court it should be satisfied that the certificate of taxation has not been set aside. 10. Reference is made to the case of Lubulellah & Associates Advocates v N. K. Brothers Limited [2014] eKLR where the court observed that:“ The law is very clear that once a taxing master has taxed the costs, issued a Certificate of Costs and there is no reference against his ruling or there has been a ruling and a determination made and not set aside and/or altered, no other action would be required from the court save to enter judgment. An applicant is not required to file suit for the recovery of costs. The certificate of costs is final as to the amounts of the costs and the court would be quite in order to enter judgment in favour of the Applicant against the Respondent herein for the taxed sum indicated in the Certificate of Taxation that was issued on 25th November 2012.” 11. From perusal of the court record this Court is satisfied that the Ruling is uncontested as the Respondent has not moved any court by way of filing a Reference against the ruling nor has the Ruling been set aside, altered, varied and / or reviewed, nor has any appeal been filed. 12. Therefore, no other action is required from this court save to enter judgment as prayed against the Respondent. Findings & Determination 13. For the forgoing reasons this court makes the following findings and determinations:i. This Court finds the application to be meritorious and it is hereby allowed; ii. The Certificate of Taxation issued on 18/07/2024 in the sum of Kshs 151,866/- is hereby adopted as a Judgment of this court. Judgment be and is hereby entered in favour of the Applicant/Advocates in the sum of Kshs 151,866/-; iii. To bring closure to this matter each party to bear their own costs of this application. https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/7276/eng@2025-05-23 2
page 2 of 3
Orders Accordingly. DATED SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIA TEAMS AT KIAMBU THIS 23rd DAY OF MAY, 2025. HON. A. MSHILA JUDGE In the presence of ; Sanja – Court Assistant Ombati hb for Njagi for Applicant https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/7276/eng@2025-05-23 3
page 3 of 3