Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 7100 of 2025

In re GKM (Miscellaneous Application E185 of 2023) [2025] KEHC 7100 (KLR) (Family) (29 May 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 7100 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) FAMILY MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION E185 OF 2023 PM NYAUNDI, J MAY 29, 2025 IN THE MATTER OF GKM AND MENTAL HEALTH ACT CAP 248 LAWS OF KENYA AND IN THE MATTER OF THE RIGHTS OF OLDER MEMBERS OF SOCIETY UNDER ARTICLE 57 OF THE CONSTITUION RULING 1. By Judgment dated 18th January 2024, the Court appointed BNK, SWK AND VWM as guardians and managers of the Estate of the subject herein. 2. It is now alleged that the Respondent herein, BNK is wasting the estate and therefore his appointment should be revoked. 3. Notwithstanding that the Court directed that the parties file submissions, at the time of writing this ruling none of the parties had filed their submissions. 4. In considering this application I am mindful of the mandate of this Court. It is limited to considering an application presented under the Mental Health Act and if satisfied make orders for the guardianship of the Subject and the management of his/ her afiairs. 5. On delivery of judgment the Court is functus oficio, so that whereas now there are disputes on the management of the Estate, the proper forum would be the Court that has the mandate to challenge the validity of the sale of land, the transfer of shares from the Company and the withdrawal of money from bank account. That does not lie with this Court. The Co Guardians (Applicants) as Guardians and https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/7100/eng@2025-05-29 1

page 1 of 2

Manager of the Estate of the deceased have the wherewithal to challenge the actions of the Respondent herein but before a Court of competent jurisdiction. 6. Once it is established that the respondent has acted contrary to the mandate conferred on him, this Court will proceed to revoke that appointment. 7. Accordingly, the application is struck out for want of jurisdiction. 8. There shall be no order as to costs. It is so ordered SIGNED DATED AND DELIVERED IN VIRTUAL COURT THIS 29TH DAY OF MAY 2025. P M NYAUNDI HIGH COURT JUDGE In the presence of No appearance by parties Fardosa Court Assistant https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/7100/eng@2025-05-29 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.