Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Edwin Omondi Achola & 1 other

Republic v Achola & another (Criminal Case E018 of 2024) [2025] KEHC 6742 (KLR) (10 April 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 6742 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MIGORI CRIMINAL CASE E018 OF 2024 ACA ONG’INJO, J APRIL 10, 2025 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ PROSECUTOR AND EDWIN OMONDI ACHOLA ................................................................ 1ST ACCUSED CALEB OCHIENG OMBEGO .............................................................. 2ND ACCUSED RULING 1. The accused persons Caleb Ochieng Ombego and Edwin Omondi Achola were jointly charged with the ofience of murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. 2. The particulars were the accused persons on the 19th day of May 2024 at Nyasare Village Wasweta 1 Sub Location, Suna East Sub Country within Migori County jointly with others not before court murdered Sammy Chacha. 3. Upon consideration of the evidence of the 6 prosecution witnesses and the submissions filed by the defence counsel this court finds that the prosecution evidence raises a prima facie case sufficient to place accused persons on their defence. They have a case to answer. DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT MIGORI THIS 10TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025. A. ONGINJO JUDGE In the presence of: State Counsel Ms. Ikol https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/6742/eng@2025-04-10 1

page 1 of 2

Mr. Otieno Advocate for Accused Duke r Court Assistant Accused 1 and Accused 2 both present https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/6742/eng@2025-04-10 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.