Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Erick Odongo Onyango & 5 others v Republic

Onyango & 5 others v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E157 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 6281 (KLR) (20 May 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 6281 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KISUMU MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION E157 OF 2025 A MABEYA, J MAY 20, 2025 BETWEEN ERICK ODONGO ONYANGO ............................................................. 1ST ACCUSED DENNIS ONYANGO ............................................................................. 2ND ACCUSED WYCLIFFE MBOYA ............................................................................... 3RD ACCUSED TIMOTHY OKUMU .............................................................................. 4TH ACCUSED COLLINGS OTIENO ............................................................................. 5TH ACCUSED EDWARD OUKO ................................................................................... 6TH ACCUSED AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ PROSECUTOR (From Original Maseno Senior Principal Magistrate Criminal Case No. E520 of 2020) RULING 1. Having considered the geographical jurisdiction of the Magistrate Courts of Maseno and Kombewa, this file is hereby withdrawn from Maseno Law Courts and transferred to Kombewa Law Courts. 2. Mention on 29/5/2025 before Head of Station, Kombewa Law Court for further directions. 3. This file is closed. It is so ordered. DATED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 20TH DAY OF MAY, 2025 A. MABEYA, FCI, Arb JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/6281/eng@2025-05-20 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.