Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 5647 of 2025

JK v JYK (Matrimonial Cause E003 of 2024) [2025] KEHC 5647 (KLR) (28 April 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 5647 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAKURU MATRIMONIAL CAUSE E003 OF 2024 SM MOHOCHI, J APRIL 28, 2025 BETWEEN JK .................................................................................................................. PLAINTIFF AND JYK ............................................................................................................ DEFENDANT RULING 1. The Preliminary Objection of contravention of Section 19 of Civil Procedure Code of there being a primary suit is overruled. The petitioner filed this application together with the originating summons dated 15th February, 2024. 2. Interlocutory reliefs are available in matrimonial property dispute even where spouse are not officially divorced. 3. That being the case and in exercise of the discretion bestowed on me I am inclined to find merit in and issue the following prayers from the application dated 15th February, 2024: a. 4. An order restraining the Defendant, his agents, servants or employees is hereby issued from selling, alienating, washing, renting or transferring in any way parcels of land in Kiamunyi Residential Plot No.18 and Moka Housing Cooperative Scheme to the detriment of the Plaintiff, pending hearing and determination of the main suit. The costs of this application shall be in the cause. It is so ordered. RULING READ, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAKURUTHIS 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 ............................. MOHOCHI. S. M. JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/5647/eng@2025-04-28 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.