Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 5081 of 2025

In re Estate of Josiah Njehia Thomas Gitiya (Deceased) (Succession Cause 77 of 2008) [2025] KEHC 5081 (KLR) (29 April 2025) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 5081 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAKURU SUCCESSION CAUSE 77 OF 2008 HI ONG'UDI, J APRIL 29, 2025 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JOSIAH NJEHIA THOMAS GITIYA – DECEASED. IN THE MATTER OF RACHEL WAITHIRA NGUGI ......................................................... 1ST APPLICANT THOMAS GITAU NJEHIA ............................................................... 2ND APPLICANT RULING 1. I have been able to peruse the application dated 5/3/2025 filed by way of Notice of Motion. It is supported by the grounds on its face plus the supporting affidavit of Rachel Waithera Ngugi and Thomas Gitau Njehia the Applicants. 2. The application seeks a review of the orders made on 26/2/2015 confirming the grant so that additional information in respect of the deceased’s estate may be included. 3. Prayer 3 of the Notice of Motion lists a number of properties belonging to the deceased which were not available at the time of distribution. They are Mau Summit/Molo Block 1 Numbers 1603, 1611, 1607, 1597, 1596, 1605 and 1606. 4. Paragraph 4 lists who the purchasers of the above properties are. It’s the applicants’ prayer that the said pieces/parcels of land be vested in the said purchasers. Annexed to the application are the sale agreements in respect of the said parcels of land. The vendor in all the sale agreements is Josiah Njehia Thomas Gitiya the deceased herein. 5. The allocation to the purchasers as per the sale agreements is as follows: i. David Mirara Githinji and Harun Njoroge Githinji (joint purchasers) of Mau Summit/Molo Block 1/1603 ii. Harun Njoroge Mwangi and Florence Wanjiru Kiiru (joint purchasers) of Mau Summit/Molo Block 1/1611 https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/5081/eng@2025-04-29 1

page 1 of 2

iii. Tom Mokuah (purchaser) of Mau Summit/Molo Block 1/1607 iv. John Kimani Ngige and Stephen Kihara Wairimu (Joint purchasers) of Mau Summit/Molo Block 1/1597. v. Stanley Wainaina Githinji (purchaser) of Mau Summit/Molo Block 1/1596 vi. Grace Wamboi Kiarie (purchaser) of Mau Summit/Molo Block 1/1605 vii. John Kimani Ngige (Purchaser) of Mau Summit/Molo Block 1/1606 6. The sale agreements show that each parcel measurers 0.045 Hectares. 7. I am satisfied that the purchasers are entitled to ownership of the said parcels of land and the Applicants who are the Administrators of the Estate of the deceased Josiah Njehia Thomas Gitiya want to have the land released to each of the purchasers. I therefore allow the application dated 5th March, 2025 in terms of prayers 2, 3 and 4. The orders are that: a. The rectified certificate of confirmation of grant issued on 26th February 2015 is hereby further rectified to include the parcels of land set out in prayer 3 of the Notice of Motion and paragraph 3 of this Ruling. b. The said parcels of land shall vest in the purchasers whose names are set out in prayer 4 of the Notice of Motion and paragraph 5 of this Ruling. 8. This is a very old matter which needs to be finalized. With the above identification and outline I hereby direct the Land Registrar Nakuru to fast track the issuance of Title deeds to the purchasers upon payments of the requisite fees. 9. Costs of the application to be paid for by the estate of the deceased. Orders accordingly. DELIVERED VIRTUALLY THIS 29TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 IN OPEN COURT AT NAKURU. H. I. ONG’UDI JUDGE In the presence of Mr. Mbugua for M/s Wamaitha for both petitioners/Applicants Jamleck C/A https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/5081/eng@2025-04-29 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.