Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Winston Sayi & 2 others

Republic v Sayi & 2 others (Criminal Appeal E005 of 2022) [2025] KEHC 4850 (KLR) (Crim) (8 April 2025) (Resentence) Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 4850 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPEAL E005 OF 2022 CJ KENDAGOR, J APRIL 8, 2025 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ................................................................................................ APPELLANT AND WINSTON SAYI ............................................................................. 1ST RESPONDENT BEAVERLY OTIENO .................................................................... 2ND RESPONDENT DUNCAN ODHIAMBO ............................................................... 3RD RESPONDENT (Being an appeal against the Judgment of Hon. M.W. Mutuku, Chief Magistrate in Milimani Criminal Case No. 369 of 2018) RESENTENCE 1. I have considered the mitigation ofiered and the reports by the probation oficers. I sentence the accused persons to pay a fine of Kshs.50,000/= in default to serve six months imprisonment for the ofience of conspiracy to defraud contrary to Section 317 of the Penal Code. 2. Right of Appeal explained. 3. It is so ordered. DATED, DELIVERED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI IN OPEN COURT ON THIS 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025. C. KENDAGOR JUDGE In the presence of:- https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/4850/eng@2025-04-08 1

page 1 of 2

Court Assistant: Beryl Mr. Kamau Advocate for 1st Respondent Mr. Lusweti Advocate for 2nd Respondent Mr. Odhiambo Advocate for 3rd Respondent Mr. Chebii ODPP for Appellant https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2025/4850/eng@2025-04-08 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.